World War I And II - 1389 Words

In 1914 World War I broke out and not too long after World War II followed. This conflict led countries against each other and in contrast brought them together. New developments and changes occurred following this war just as they did previous ones. The world is constantly altering itself and wars help speed this up by following with advancements in technology, philosophy, and literature. Change resulting from WWI was either frowned upon or embraced and new forms of expression arose within art, literature, and beliefs. As some authors took on a new way of thinking others were stuck in their ways and preferred a prewar era. Amongst the two wars, World War I and II, the United States was well on its way to becoming a fully modernized†¦show more content†¦Traditional literary forms were basically destroyed by the pressures of modernity. Modernism was started due to the belief that old ways of life (prewar) and the rules that went along with them, were no longer relevant during this time. Some believed that using old literary forms was old fashioned while others believed that failure to honor the previous movements resulted in a bad piece of work. Due to people being so used to the post-civil war era it made it difficult for more modernistic writers to become popular among readers. New poems and fictional stories utilize more dream imagery and symbolism rather than that of realism and naturalism. The Snows of Kilimanjaro, written by Ernest Hemmingway, captures the ideas of modernism in the story about Harry and how he looks back on his life. He opens his story with the image of a lone leopard who sought the tip of Kilimanjaro or â€Å"The House of God†. Adding also another very recognizable animal the Hyena representing where he is now dying in the plains. These two areas and creatures associated with them are commonly used to represent different things. The events that take place in the plains are horrible and tragic while the good events are repr esented by the mountain where his best memories are held. At the end of the story Henry dies and a plane fly’s over the top of Kilimanjaro which symbolizes that he will live an eternal life due to the choices Henry had made in his

Applying Alfred Adlers Personality Theory to George W...

When choosing a â€Å"famous† person on which to do my research proposal on I decided on one of my favorite presidents in my time. George W. Bush seemed to be the most â€Å"real† president we have had in office since the 90’s. Next, I chose Adler’s theory to apply to Bush do to the fact that is the theorist that most closely applied to Bush’s life. Let ‘s start with some back ground about George W. Bush and then apply Adler’s theory. George W Bush was born on July 6, 1946. He was born in New Haven Connecticut where his father was attending Yale University. George’s father had served in World War II as a Navy pilot ; he was using his GI bill like many other veterans to get back into the flow of civilian life. (Wade, 1999) After his father†¦show more content†¦He became governor of Texas in 1994. In 1999 first governor to re –elected for a four year term. He became the 43rd president of the United States on Januar y 20, 2001. (Wade, 1999) Now on to how Alder applies to George W Bush’s life. First let’s start with the where bush stands in his family constellation. He is the first born of six children. (Wade, 1999) According to Adler prediction the first child is the â€Å"problem child.† First born children are achievement orientated and feel entitled to rank. Since they were born first they always prefer to be on top. (FragerFadiman, 2013)According to research done parents are more anxious with their first born and therefore push them harder then any of their other children. Research also shows that many first born’s are type A personalities. (FragerFadiman, 2013) He tried hard all his life to stay on top in his parents eyes. George has always been an achiever. When he was young he attended Camp Longhorn in the Texas Hill Country. (Wade, 1999) Even at Camp he received the highest honor by receiving the Campfire Lighter Award. You can only receive it once and you receive it by being an outs tanding camper. (Wade, 1999)Since his was young George has followed in his father’s footsteps. He chose the same prep school his father, Phillips Academy in Massachusetts. Both him and his father attended Yale University. (Wade, 1999) He later attended Harvard to get his masters

The Indians and Human Progress free essay sample

The Indians, and Human Progress† written by Howard Zinn and â€Å"The City on the Hill† written by Larry Schweikert and Allen Michael I have analyzed three specific topics/concepts that have been presented by both authors. The first topic that I observed was Christopher Columbus. Howard Zinn’s article was mainly focused on Columbus while Larry S. and Allen M. ’s article covered many explorers including Columbus. Howard Zinn more wrote his view on Columbus as a story as the other authors wrote a lot of facts and what you would call â€Å"boring† information. Both of the authors included gory details of Columbus’s expedition which didn’t create the same â€Å"heroic† effect that I learnt from earlier years. These two inserts also might differ because one is a Patriot’s History of the United States and the other is a People’s History of the United States. My Second topic that I noticed after reading both inserts is how these early explorers changed the world in different ways. We will write a custom essay sample on The Indians and Human Progress or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In the insert of â€Å"The City on the Hill† It describes many expeditions. When Marco Polo and others traveled to China they brought back tales of wealth and unusual goods. Portugal explorers dispatched ships to Africa and brought back ivory and gold then transported and sold slaves to varies Mediterranean estates. Christopher Columbus discovered Islands in the Bahamas, Cuba, and a â€Å"New World†. On the other hand the insert form â€Å"Columbus, The Indians, and Humans Progress† talks about how Columbus explored the Islands of the Bahamas and discovered the traits of the Arawaks Indians. Columbus brought back slaves to England. Both inserts explain what these explorers’ intentions were and what they brought back. Overall, these articles differ because one is mainly on Columbus and the other is on all explorers. Finally my last topic is on the concept of greed. Greed came into both of these articles quite a few times. In the second paragraph of the insert â€Å"Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress† Columbus wrote about how the Arawaks would make fine servants even after these Indians greeted Columbus’s people with gifts and food. Gold was also a great cause for greed; Columbus forced the natives to go find gold otherwise they would get killed. Similarly in the insert â€Å"The City on the Hall† explorers such as Marco Polo and Prince Henry, all brought back silks, spices, slaves and so on to their homeland. Also many explorers such as the Spanish ruined the natives’ lives by killing them, making them slaves, and taking all their houses and food away. This insert shows how cruel many explores were, where as Howard Zinn’s only talks about the cruelty of Columbus. The overall point of view or perspective of these authors was that many explorers weren’t what people made them up to be. In fact in reality these explores were quite unruly when it came to territory, Fame and Money. In the insert the â€Å"They City on the Hill† an example would be in 1517 the Protestant Reformation fostered a fierce and bloody competition for power and territory between Catholic and Protestant nations that reinforced national concerns. The information in a way is directly down grading these explorers which shows how the authors felt. In the insert â€Å"The City on the Hill† an example of this would be when Columbus got into a fight with Indians who refused to trade as many bow and arrows as he and his men wanted so in result they ran swords through two of the natives who then bled to death. The difference between these two books show how different the nature of writing is, like from being factual to narrative. It also shows how bias some authors and how unreliable books can be. These views might also depend on what year the article was written, who the book was written to inform, and where the book was written to sell. In different places in the world the views on History are going to differ by the way you look at it.